Home / News / Celebrity News Meghan Markle’s pregnancy: What we know so far She's healthy, happy and hardly "geriatric." By Heather Marcoux October 15, 2018 Rectangle With the big news now out of the way, pregnant Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry have begun a massive tour of Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific. Over the next two weeks the couple is set to make 76 engagements. (We’re tired just thinking about it.) With a schedule like that it seems like Meghan is probably feeling as good as a pregnant person can, and reports suggest she’s had a 12-week ultrasound, which means she’s just rolling into her second trimester—a time many mamas look back on as their “easiest” part of pregnancy. The tour schedule is a daunting one, but of course many women travel and work during their pregnancies, and Meghan has never been one to sit still long. Basically, there’s no reason an uncomplicated pregnancy would warrant a big change in her plans. Here’s what we know about Meghan’s pregnancy so far: She’s well aware of the Zika situation Entertainment Tonight reports the Duchess will not be accompanying her husband to engagements at the Fiji War Memorial or the Colo-i-Suva forest (she’ll be doing morning tea at the British High Commissioner’s residence and meeting women vendors at a local market instead, Hello reports ), and this schedule tweak is possibly pregnancy-related. The World Health Organization advises against travel to by pregnant people to Fiji (and Tonga, another island on the Duke and Duchess’ itinerary) due to the risk of Zika virus, which is transmitted by mosquitoes. The Duchess has likely discussed Zika risks extensively with her medical team, and if they’ve given her the green light, no one should hassle her about this. It’s her choice, and in both Tonga and Fiji, the risk of Zika infection is now a lot lower than it was in 2016, CNN reports. We can expect to see lots of long-sleeved outfits on that part of the tour. While she’s technically experiencing a “geriatric pregnancy,” that term is outdated “Geriatric” is absolutely the last word we would ever associate with the youthful beauty that is Meghan Markle, but at 37, she’s technically in the zone that some doctors (still) refer to as a “geriatric pregnancy.” The unfortunate (and downright rude) term has been replaced in the vocabulary of many medical providers by “advanced maternal age” (which is slightly less rude), but is still being used by many members of the press covering Markle’s pregnancy announcement. Labeling the Duchess’ pregnancy as geriatric may be technically correct as she’s over 35 but it’s hardly necessary when there are much kinder ways to phrase it. And while many royal watchers are pointing out that Meghan’s advanced maternal age puts her at higher risk for some pregnancy complications, plenty of healthy 37-year-old women have babies every day. Now is actually a great time for her to travel While a lot of airlines don’t recommend or even allow traveling (especially a long international flight) late in pregnancy (we’re talking like 38 weeks) Meghan is still far from that stage. The UK’s National Health Service advices British moms-to-be that late pregnancy and early pregnancy are the trickiest when it comes to travel, noting the airline rules and that: “Some women try to avoid travelling in the first 12-15 weeks of pregnancy because exhaustion and nausea tend to be worse at this early stage.” It sounds like Meghan is just beyond that uncomfortable bit and into the fun part of pregnancy. We can’t wait to see some royal bump pics. You might also like: Meghan Markle is pregnant! Congratulations to Prince Harry and the Duchess ? The best photos of Princess Charlotte and Prince George at Princess Eugenie’s royal wedding 5 times Kate Middleton was a mom first, royal second The latest News Jason and Kylie Kelce’s daughters’ hilarious reactions to baby no. 4 steal the show in Instagram announcement Viral & Trending Why Volvo’s new ad is the emotional reset every parent needs right now News What parents need to know about the ‘glass child’ effect—and how to address it News New study shows Black women are 25% more likely to have C-sections, but why?